Lecture on Programming Environment

URL

http://www.hpcs.cs.tsukuba.ac.jp/~tatebe/lecture/h23/proenv/

Room

3B203

Contact

Lecturer	Lecturer
Mitsuhisa Sato	Osamu Tatebe
msato [at] cs.tsukuba.ac.jp Director room, Center for Computational Sciences	tatebe [at] cs.tsukuba.ac.jp room 304, Center for Computational Sciences

Syllabus

Lecture Note

Prof. Sato's Lecture Note

Date Title Lecturer

12/1(Thu) Grid Programming (1) Tatebe

12/8(Thu) Grid Programming (2) Tatebe

12/15(Thu) Canceled

12/22(Thu) Programming for High Performance Computing Tatebe

1/19(Thu) Cloud Programming Tatebe

1/26(Thu) Distributed Programming in Java Sato

2/2(Thu) Web Programming Sato

2/9(Thu) Programming for Embedded Systems Sato

2/16(Thu) Programming for GPGPU and Manycore Processors Sato

2/23(Thu) Presentation Tatebe

Date	Title	Lecturer
12/1(Thu)	Grid Programming (1)	Tatebe
12/8(Thu)	Grid Programming (2)	Tatebe
12/15(Thu)	Canceled
12/22(Thu)	Programming for High Performance Computing	Tatebe
1/19(Thu)	Cloud Programming	Tatebe
1/26(Thu)	Distributed Programming in Java	Sato
2/2(Thu)	Web Programming	Sato
2/9(Thu)	Programming for Embedded Systems	Sato
2/16(Thu)	Programming for GPGPU and Manycore Processors	Sato
2/23(Thu)	Presentation	Tatebe

Assignment for students that require special treatment (Tokubetsu Sochi Gakusei)

Read related papers to the class (introduced in the class), and write your opinions on the papers. You should include the following points;

Overview, proposal, and contribution
Paper evaluation
- Evaluate about the contribution: (5: excellent, 4: good, 3: fair, 2: little, 1: no contribution)
- Explain the reason of the evaluation by one or two paragraphs
- Evaluate about the soundness. For example, are the proposal and the contribution based on some experiments? Is the assumption reasonable? Is the evaluation setting reasonable? Is the conclusion lead by the experiments? Are there another but better experiment setting? Are there any point that authors should consider?
- What is limitation of the proposed approach?
Pick up three questions about the paper.
Consider interesting extension or the future research.
Consider other comments.

Deadline: 2/3(Fri) 20:00 (sharp, the paper will not be accepted after the deadline.)
The paper should be a PDF format. Send the paper to tatebe _at_ cs by email with the subject PERP student ID. The email body should include the comment or the impression about the class.

2/23 Presentation

Pick up a topic in the following list, and summarise your opinion by four to five pages of PPT slide. The first page should include your name, title, and student ID number. Uniqueness, interesting idea, sharp investigation, and concrete implementation are encouraged.

ideal programming environment
your opinion about Web programming (based on your experience)
drawback of parallel programming environment and how to improve it
embedded multicore programming environment
required feature for grid programming environment
cloud programming environment

Deadline: 2/22(Wed) 17:00
The slide should be a PPT or PDF format. Send the slide to tatebe _at_ cs by email with the subject PEPR student ID.

On February 22, you are requested to give a talk using the slide for about four minutes. Evaluation will be done by the presentation and the final report assignment.

Final report assignment

Submit a paper of the above assignment for students that require special treatment (Tokubetsu Sochi Gakusei).

Deadline: 3/2(Fri) 20:00 (sharp, the paper will not be accepted after the deadline.)
The paper should be a PDF format. Send the paper to tatebe _at_ cs by email with the subject PERP student ID. The email body should include the comment or the impression about the class.

Osamu Tatebe